Freeman Dyson on Global Warming 2of2 Stratospheric Cooling
Uploaded by: Sidewinder77
Video Description:
A prominent scientist who's followed the science of global warming from the beginning, Dyson explains why climate models have no scientific merit, why average global ground temperature is a great fiction, and what he believes the real dangers of increased CO2 in the atmosphere are. He suggests that the relatively simple solution of land use management could potentially give us the ability to control the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere at any level we'd like, and there's no need to stop burning coal and oil.
From http://peoplesarchive.com/browse/movies/1248/en/off/
Tags for this video: Climate CO2 Coal Computer Cooling Dyson Freeman Global Hydrocarbons Models Oil Stratospheric Vegetation Warming
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by Sidewinder77
| Weather Channel Founder Blasts Global Warming Al Gore | Michael Crichton on Global Warming, Part 1 of 3 | Charlie Rose - DYSON / PETIT |
 |  |  |
| Listen to the Scientists: Global Warming & the I.P.C.C. | Global Warming Hoax | Freeman Dyson: Let's look for life in the outer solar system |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
You pass on all the regulatory enforcement
to the next administration which will
probably be Obama. This is why
republicans have been raiding the
treasury, spending every dollar it
could because it already knew about
climate change and peak oil & that
the jig is up. Take the money, spread
the corruption-such great patriots-
all because the expense of court ordered
CC regulation would make Bush look bad.
Obama is stepping right into the trap.
--Piers Corbyn,
solar physisist,
ARCS, FRAS, FRMetS,
WeatherAction, the Long Range Forecasters,
developer, SWT (Solar Weather Technique),
Award of AMEME Hopley Shield 2008
Famine - combines with weather control, better crops and ways to analyse the ground and supply water and nutrients, as well as storing large amounts of conserved food at various storage places all over the earth.
Flooding - weather control. No problem if you can freeze or evaporate large amounts of water and predict/control rain patterns.
Volcanoes - a bit like earthquakes, lower the pressure within the volcano, before it is enough to burst itself out.
Got more? Bring it on.
Disease - any guess where this is going? Yeah right: find it, analyse its DNA and working mechanisms and come up with a cure. Not that hard, just a matter of better technology
Please don't try to deconstruct it, just cause I said DNA, which doesn't apply everywhere.
doesn't have a PhD. The reason he doesn't**
Nah, having a PHD in a special Subject is about as useless as a Masters in English Degree in England (Or any Specialist Master Degree)
All you really can do with non medical Doctorates or Masters is teach the subject as a Professor. If you teach with a Bachelors or Associates then you would be a "Instructor"..but if you are teaching or researching outside your specialty your a "Instructor" anyway
Example: Andrew Weaver, one of the CO-Autors of the IPCC repiort has a PHD in Physics but is with the OCeanic INstitute and studies climatology, While Being a Enviromental Activist. THis makes him a "Instructor" in Envoromental Sciences....a "expert" in "Man Made Global warming" as it were
Now if he had a PHD in Meteorology instead and wasn't a advent "tree Hugger" he would know better...lol
quoting spambots that show up trying to show that
you still own some ground in your fake argument
with yourself. You need to review how to provoke
a false argument while pretending to be a genuine
searcher for truth. To be a real person instead of
a spamer you need to pass the Turing Test.
You failed spammer. You are not a searcher for
anything except manufacturing doubt.
a false argument while pretending to be a genuine
searcher for truth. To be a real person instead of
a spamer you need to pass the Turing Test.**
Instead of opening your argument with quotes
you need to deviate from the talking points
format. Lets see, start with incomplete quote,
follow up with a fog of words, then launch into
climate change denier cut and paste that we
used to see in Intelligent Design & Big Tobacco.
a spamer you need to pass the Turing Test.**
Always been partial to Carl Sagan's balony detection kit
**You need to review how to provoke
a false argument while pretending to be a genuine**
If you have the field or lab test to prove
1) burning fossil fuels make Co2
2) CO2 can retain more then .10f while uncontained at .038% by volume
3) Co2 can get airbone aside from the precipitation cycle as Co2 is 5x heavier then air.
then I'll admit I'm wrong